In a precedent-based legal system, you can’t know what the law is if you don’t have judicial opinions explaining why the courts have reached their conclusions.

Karen Conti, Chicago trial attorney, joins Bob Sirott to talk about the Supreme Court’s decision to allow President Trump to continue getting rid of certain parts of the Department of ...

A federal judge in Tennessee could rule on whether to release Kilmar Abrego Garcia from jail as he awaits trial on human smuggling charges. A decision to free the Maryland construction worker ...

Trump simply snatched the power to make and repeal major federal legislation and programs that affect millions of American children for himself.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon announced the interagency agreement on Tuesday, a day after the Supreme Court cleared the ...

After a Supreme Court ruling that allowed the Department of Education to proceed with mass firings, Jen Psaki explains the repercussions that this might have on the future of education in the United ...

The Trump administration has begun its process of dismantling the U.S. Department of Education following a Supreme Court ...

In ruling the president can decimate the Department of Education, the court took a key congressional power—and gave it to Trump.

The high court action enables the administration to resume work on winding down the department, one of Trump's biggest ...

The main factor limiting Head Start seats is a lack of trained teachers, said Diane Schilder, a senior fellow at the Urban ...

The Supreme Court cleared the way for mass Education Department layoffs, bolstering President Donald Trump’s federal workforce cuts while legal battles continue.

The Trump administration is moving full-steam ahead with plans to gut the Education Department after getting a green light from the Supreme Court. Conservatives are in celebration mode ...